401k Plans – US-India Tax Implications & related considerations

Last Updated – May 01, 2026

401k is an employer sponsored retirement plan in the US and a powerful and tax-advantaged way to help employees save regularly and build a decent retirement corpus. So, most of the Indian expats in the US regularly invest a portion of their salary income in 401k. The confusion arises when they are planning to return to India and are unclear on the the US-India taxation of the accumulated value of the 401k and what should be their strategy for those funds and has significant scope for tax planning. Also, there are compliance requirements that need to be ensured. In this post, let us discuss all this and more.

Key Features of 401k Plans

1. Annual contributions are subject to IRS-mandated limits given here, which are adjusted yearly for inflation. These limits include both employee pre-tax contributions and employer matching/non-elective contributions. Employees aged 50 and over are typically allowed to make additional “catch-up” contributions.
2. Contributions are primarily made by employees through payroll deductions on a pre-tax basis (reducing current taxable income). Employers may also contribute via matching contributions or non-elective contributions.
3. Contributions can be made only from earned income. So, for example an expat who has left his job in US and returned to India & not working for a US based employer may not be able to continue contributing to the 401k.
4. Employer contributions (matching or non-elective) often follow a vesting schedule. Employees must work for the company for a certain period before they fully “own” the employer contributions. Employee contributions are always 100% vested immediately.
5. Funds can generally be rolled over into another employer’s 401k plan (if permitted) or an IRA
6. The plan is governed by the specific rules set by the employer (Plan Document), the plan administrator, and federal laws (IRS and Department of Labor regulations).
7. 401k assets are generally protected from creditors under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
8. Investment choices are typically limited to a menu of funds selected and managed by the plan administrator or employer.
9. Participants must generally begin taking RMDs from their account starting at a specific age (currently 73 for most individuals, though this is subject to legislative change), regardless of whether they need the money.

US Income Tax

401k can be a pre-tax 401k or a post-tax 401k. First let us discuss about pre-tax 401k and towards the end of the section, I’ve talked about post tax 401k.

US has taxation of incomes at 2 levels – At federal level and state level. Federal level taxation is generally as follows-

• On contributions – You get a deduction from your taxable income – so effectively the contribution gets invested in a tax deferred way.
• Accrued income within 401k – tax deferred.
• Distributions – Fully taxable.

If we see above, the net tax advantage of investing in 401k is tax deferred growth. More money gets to be invested and grown in a tax free way with tax implication at the time of distribution – in India terminology, you can treat it like an Exempt, Exempt, Taxable (EET) type of a taxation system.

On a state level, as regards US state residents, states generally yield to the federal taxation model with some exceptions who either impose zero state income tax on distributions or impose additional tax (apart from regular tax on distributions)  on early distributions. Public Law 104-95, enacted in 1996, amended Title 4 of the United States Code by adding Section 114. It prohibits all US states from taxing certain retirement income of non-residents to prevent double taxation on retirement income.

​Taxation in US on the distributions will also differ depending on the residency status of the person in US at that time.

• US person  – taxable at a federal level on graduated rates + may also be liable to state tax if she is a state resident.
• Non-US person – 401k taxation for a non-resident alien for US tax purposes is a slightly grey area to my reading of the law. A conservative interpretation is that the entire distribution is in nature of FDAP income at hence taxable in US at a flat rate of 30% or a reduced treaty rate – the India US DTAA does not prescribe any exemption from US tax/reduced rate unless it is a SEPP which may be exempt in US & only taxable in India (discussed later in this post).

Taxation of distribution to a non-resident – Can it be considered a mix of FDAP & ECI?

Another interpretation can be taken in view of Section 864 of Internal Revenue Code is that the portion of distribution that can be allocated to the contribution made by employer and employee is treated as ECI and offered to tax at graduated rates and the earnings portion treated as FDAP and taxed at 30%. Relevant extract from Section 864 (c )(6) given below for reference below:

(6)Treatment of certain deferred payments, etc. For purposes of this title, in the case of any income or gain of a non-resident alien individual or a foreign corporation which—

(A) is taken into account for any taxable year, but

(B) is attributable to a sale or exchange of property or the performance of services (or any other transaction) in any other taxable year,

the determination of whether such income or gain is taxable under section 871(b) or 882 (as the case may be) shall be made as if such income or gain were taken into account in such other taxable year and without regard to the requirement that the taxpayer be engaged in a trade or business within the United States during the taxable year referred to in subparagraph (A).

There is only one reference point for this taxation approach which is the IRS practice unit manual here (training documentation for IRS agents) that states compensation portion is ECI, rest FDAP. However, can you place reliance on this document? IRS has a specific disclaimer here that practice unit guidance are not binding on IRS.

Apart from this, I could not find any IRS rulings or case laws to support this interpretation and hence the same needs to be carefully viewed w.r.t. tax savings vis a vis the risk of the IRS taking a different interpretation and imposing accuracy penalties. In such a situation, taxpayers taking a FDAP/ECI split position should better have a written opinion from credentialled tax professional in US (CPA, EA, tax attorney) + disclose the position with tax return in Form 8275 (state reliance on IRS practice unit material and relevant regs) to reduce possibility of IRS levying a 20% accuracy penalty during an audit.

Note on Tax Withholding –  Distribution to a US resident generally entails a mandatory withholding of 20% which can be too low considering person’s marginal rate + additional 10% tax. Similarly distribution to a non-resident entails a 30%. In such cases, the withholding may not cover the entire tax liability and hence the taxpayer must take steps to discharge it via estimated tax to avoid underpayment penalty at the time of filing tax return

Note on taxation of after-tax contributions in 401k – Here, the contributions, since made from post-tax money, are not taxable. Only earnings are taxable at federal level at graduated rates/30% (depending on whether person is a resident/non-resident alien). 10% additional tax for early withdrawal + state taxes (as per state tax law) may also apply.  

Estate Tax

For a non-citizen & non-domiciliary of the US (for example, a person who is not a US citizen and returns to India with no significant ties to the US), the biggest risk is estate tax in view of the very low threshold on US situs assets of US$ 60,000.

A 401k for such a non-citizen, non-domestically will constitute a US situs asset for the purposes of the US estate tax.

If a person wants to continue the 401 in the US after returning to India, then she needs to plan for the estate tax implication. Generally, a very straight-forward way to plan for it is by buying a suitable pure term insurance, to cover the estate tax risk.

Taxation in India

There is no clear treatment of 401k under Indian tax laws, neither by way of any CBDT Guidance or any clear judicial precedents on this matter. Given this situation, a returning expat with a 401k needs to be prepared for some tax litigation in case the Indian tax office interprets the taxation in a different way than what the taxpayer declares in the tax return. In the interest of providing clarity to a significant population of returning expats from the US, CBDT (India’s tax office) should provide a clarification on this matter. One also need to watch out for any CBDT guidance/judicial pronouncements on this matter and align your strategy to the same.

Before moving forward, one thing is clear that if residential status of person is NR/RNOR, the income from 401k is not taxable in India. This is the window to do whatever with your 401k as per your financial needs and situation (options discussed later in the post). Coming to possible interpretations of 401k taxation post taxpayer reaching ROR status, the ones I think possible are as follows:

Interpretation 1 – As Unrecognised Provident Fund at marginal rates

The closest product structure to a 401k in India can be that of an unrecognised provident fund and there is a high chance that the tax office can tax it like that. Unrecognised provident fund (URPF) is a provident fund not approved under Part A of Fourth Schedule, so it does not enjoy the specific exemptions of recognised PF under the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act.

Taxation of 401k as an unrecognised PF at the time of distribution can take the following form:

• Employee’s own contribution: Not taxable, as it is capital in nature.
• Interest on employee’s contribution (or earnings pertaining to employee’s contribution) : Taxable under the head “Income from other sources”
• Employer’s contribution (total, for all past years) & interest (~ earnings) on employer’s contribution: Taxable as “profits in lieu of salary” under the head “Income from Salaries”

Taxation here will be as per marginal rates. There are grey areas as to logistically how easily the split is available between contributions/earnings and employee/employer share etc.

Interpretation 2 – Accretion post ROR taxable at marginal rates

Another interpretation that can be preferred & which, in my view, is a conservative one and can be preferred to reduce chances of litigation with the Indian tax office (however, no guarantee that such will be the case😊) is to treat the accretion in the fund value as “Income from other sources” taxable at marginal tax rates in India. If the taxpayer has opted for election under Section 158 and files Form 40, accretion is not taxable in India till he/she opts for a distribution in US (generally post age 59.5).

Here, it is worth mentioning that Form 40 requires the value as on April 1 of the first year of ROR to mentioned, and hence an inference can be drawn that Indian tax office will honour the fact that fund value as on date shall not be taxed by India & only the accretion from that date is taxable in India. To evidence the fund value as on April 1 of first year of ROR, it is important to download the statement as on date for record.

Interpretation 3 – Only “realised” gains/income within the account can be taxed at applicable rates

Another interpretation (and the one that the taxpayer may wish to take in the first argument with the tax office especially if he is holding it passively) can be that the 401k after leaving employment and held by the taxpayer is not in the nature of provident fund and is considered held as an investment account and hence it qualifies as a capital asset.

This basically ensures that instead of taxation of the distribution from the 401k as “unrecognised provident fund”, only incomes “realised” in the account during the year are taxable as per the Indian tax provisions, be it capital gains (due to portfolio rebalancing within the account) at capital gains tax rates or interest or dividend at marginal rates. Till the investor does not rebalance the portfolio or take a distribution, except interest and dividend, no other realised income may be taxable.

Now while this position is taken and after ROR the fund value within 401k grows from say $100 to $120 and only say $1 is offered to tax (dividend income), the Indian tax office may question about the balance $19 & raise a demand– then it is on you to explain your case as above that it’s a capital asset, no rebalancing was done and so on.

Now, how far this argument gets sustained cannot be said. So, in this option, in my view, there can be an increased risk of tax litigation as compared to option 1 and 2.

Another important thing to bear in mind is that Indian income tax law is essentially a tax on income and full distribution should not be taxable unless expressly stated in the law.

In my view, the argument that 401k is an investment account is not fail safe and has a better chance of sustaining for a product structure like a Traditional IRA (same pre-tax nature of investment but account opened and held by the taxpayer on his own rather than an employer-sponsored plan like 401k)). Hence it may be a good idea from a future India taxation  perspective and especially reducing the possibility of litigation with the Indian tax office, to rollover the 401k to a Traditional IRA before moving out of the US. The rollover into a Traditional IRA is not a taxable event in the US.

Tax deferral election under Section 158 of ITA 2025

In 2021, a beneficial provision was introduced in by way of Section 158 (Section 89A in ITA 1961). This provision allows you to make an election to defer India tax on 401k/Traditional IRA till the funds are withdrawn in the US. You can make an election in the first year of ROR by filing Form 40 with the Income Tax Department on the IT filing portal. However, you still have to disclose the income and claim a relief u/s 158 in the tax return. This way, the government keeps track of the year on year earned income within 401k.

Note that in a recent case of Jignesh Jariwala it has been clarified by ITAT that the election has to be done only once and it stays effective in future years & election doesn’t have to be made every year.

For a person who decides to move after a few years back to US or some other country, Rule 74 of ITR 2026 provides that the tax which was deferred in all these years will be taxable in the year person becomes a NRI – this is a big downer, wherein you may not be able to claim the India tax paid later in US, unless a narrow exception applies where you are a USC/GC and distribition is taken within next 10 years (as per US FTC carryforward rules).

Foreign Tax Credit

In case Section 158 election is done, India tax paid on 401k distribution, will be subsumed within US tax (in other words, you will get a FTC of India tax in US tax assessment) so net tax impact will likely be 30% unless person is taxed in India at marginal rates and tax rate is > 30%. Also, for cases where taxation on deferral happens on person becoming NRI (Rule 74), he may not get a tax credit of India tax at the time of taking a distribution in US in a later year.

Indian FEMA Law Implications

There is no specific mention of treatment of 401k under Indian FEMA law however the broad stipulations as applicable to foreign investments will apply to 401k also. Under Section 6(4) of FEMA, the investments that were held by a non-resident who later returns to India can continue to be held by the non-resident without any restriction.

Section 6(4) reads as follows –

(4) A person resident in India may hold, own, transfer or invest in foreign currency, foreign security or any immovable property situated outside India if such currency, security or property was acquired, held or owned by such person when he was resident outside India or inherited from a person who was resident outside India.

In view of Section 6(4) allowance for such foreign investments, it is a great opportunity for returning NRIs to continue holding their 401k or other foreign investments in US after return to India without any restrictions under FEMA law. Even after being an Indian resident, person liquidates 401k say after age 59.5, there is no compulsion under the FEMA law to remit the distribution to India. You can keep the funds in the US or more to another jurisdiction say Ireland/UAE etc. without any FEMA issues.

Indian Black Money Law Implications

In 2015, India enacted the Black Money Law, which prescribes certain penalties for undisclosed foreign income and assets. A particular section 42 of the Black Money Law requires a person who is in the resident and ordinary resident status to disclose foreign assets, failing which there is a penalty of INR 10 lakhs.

Section 42 reads as follows:

42. Penalty for failure to furnish return in relation to foreign income and asset.—

If a person, being a resident other than not ordinarily resident in India within the meaning of clause (6) of section 6 of the Income-tax Act, who is required to furnish a return of his income for any previous year, as required under sub-section (1) of section 139 of the Income-tax Act or by the provisos to that sub-section, and who at any time during such previous year,—

(i) held any asset (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India as a beneficial

owner or otherwise; or (ii) was a beneficiary of any asset (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India;

or

(iii) had any income from a source located outside India,

and fails to furnish such return before the end of the relevant assessment year, the Assessing Officer may direct that such person shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum of ten lakh rupees:

[Provided that this section shall not apply in respect of an asset or assets (other than immovable

property) where the aggregate value of such asset or assets does not exceed twenty lakh rupees.]

The important implications from this law for persons holding 401k are as follows:

1. Once the person enters the resident and ordinary resident (ROR) status in India, he/she is legally bound to disclose the 401k/Traditional IRA, as well as other foreign assets, in the Income Tax Return.
2. The interplay with the Income Tax Return and the Income Tax Act is such that even if the person does not have any income about the exemption limit in India, only for the reason that the person owns a foreign asset, will he have to file an Income Tax Return in India and disclose the foreign asset in that return.  
3. The person in the ROR status, who is looking to disclose the foreign asset, will have to use either an ITR 2, an ITR 3 because that form contains the respective Schedule FSI and FA for the disclosure requirements

Also check my Returning NRI’s guide to Black Money Act here

Estate Strategy Considerations

Generally under the US tax law, if you are a non-US citizen or a non-domiciliary AND have US-situs assets > USD 60000 AND you die, there is unto a 40% estate tax. 401k qualifies as a US-situs asset for US estate tax purposes.

If you’re a US citizen or a domiciliary (residing in US with no present intention to leave – subjective and no bright line test available) – you’re generally safe due to the very high per person USD 15M limit

All others need to plan for this risk if keeping 401k in US after return to India. Generally buying a term insurance coverage is a simple and straightforward way to cover this risk at a low cost – in this post, I’ve discussed in detail about term insurance. 

If you can’t have insurance coverage or some other way to cover this risk, in my view, liquidating 401k & moving funds outside of US may be a better approach.

It is important to note that if the person creates a revocable trust (a very good option to avoid probate in US), the 401k cannot be moved to a trust, and retitling to a trust can be considered as a distribution under US tax law inviting tax implications. Also, person cannot retitle the account as Joint Ownership. So a better option is to let it remain in Individual name and designate the beneficiary to a person (say spouse) or to a revocable trust – in both situation, the transfer of proceeds post death avoids probate without the need for a will. However, having the will also as part of estate plan has its own merits which I’ll not cover here as is not the subject matter of this post. Note that even if you have an Indian will which names 401k, the same may not be enforceable in US as the US courts may not recognise it. So generally it is a better idea to have separate will for US and Indian investments.

Common Questions on 401k for non-USC/GC

Below are some of the commonly asked questions by Indian expats (not USC/GC) on 401k. While each question deserves a separate post and detailed analysis, for the sake of making this post as a comprehensive guide, I am including my perspectives for each question. For USC/GC returning to India, see dedicated section below.

Should I Invest in 401k if not sure on my years of stay in US

Generally, one gets a tax deduction on the amount deferred via 401k and also as per the 401k terms, employers generally match employee 401k contributions till a certain limit. In my view, it makes sense to contribute at least to the extent of the employer match in all cases (as you get free money via employer match) and try to do the max. pre-tax contributions till the IRS limits especially if you are in higher tax brackets in US and even more if you live in high tax states like CA, NY etc.

Situations where you may want to not contribute to 401k is where you have unsecured high cost loans like credit card debt to close, or need funds for a upcoming short term financial goal or need to build an emergency fund, or you fall into the lower tax brackets/zero tax states etc.

Regarding after-tax 401k contributions/ Roth 401k (both have different tax treatments), while it gives tax deferred compounding and can be a great strategy for someone in high income brackets in US and wants to grow wealth in a tax deferred way, one needs to be careful to invest after tax if planning to return to India as the India tax system on after tax accounts may not give a Section 158 election advantage and is anyways unclear. As a result, the investment of incremental savings (above pre-tax limit) can be into taxable accounts. This ensures a cleaner taxation in India & also allows for a reset of cost basis in NRA/RNOR window and hence can be a more tax efficient option.

What to do with my 401k on return to India

401k/Traditional IRA is supposed to be a long-term investment and not to be touched till retirement. Decision to continue or withdraw 401k/IRA on return to India is a difficult decision which involves many factors to consider.

Generally, if you have clear long term USD denominated goals (especially child’s future US education) and you don’t need those funds till age 59.5 and a high probability of returning to the US, it may be a better approach to keep the Traditional IRA intact till then. The only thing (if you’re not a USC) is to plan estate tax risk exposure and be prepared for some tax on the accretion element in India.

Again, while the US taxation is clear, the options below will also differ depending on the tax treatment interpretation chosen by you for India.

There are the following options I can think of, as below:

Option 1 – Liquidate entire 401k

The withdrawal will be taxed for NRA as FDAP (conservative interpretation) at 30% + 10% early withdrawal penalty in US. No tax in India if withdrawn during RNOR.

If you’re withdrawing as a US resident, the withdrawal will be taxed as per graduated rates in federal and state. Also, some states like CA have a separate state specific early withdrawal penalty.

Generally, as discussed earlier, distribution from 401k will constitute “retirement income” & due to Title 4/Section 114, states do not have the right to tax 401k distribution after a person becomes a non-resident of the state hence especially for people living in high tax states like California, it makes sense to withdraw after moving out of the US and becoming a US state non-resident. If we assume state tax of 9% and 2.5% additional tax on early withdrawal, you can compare like this –

1. Withdrawal while being resident – taxed at graduated rate say 20% + 10% additional federal tax + 9% state tax + 2.5% additional state tax – total 41.5%
2. Withdrawal after becoming a non-resident – taxed at flat 30% + 10% additional federal tax = 40%

As we can see above, withdrawal after becoming NR is slightly more tax efficient in this case. Please check your state tax law on this matter before taking a final decision or consult a professional.

So, the timing of liquidation (before return to India vs after return) is important.

You can then move the money outside the US say to India (resident bank account/RFC) or Irish ETFs ETF as per your asset allocation. My detailed post on Irish ETF strategy here

The benefit may be that the funds are no longer exposed to estate tax, you can have diversification through Irish ETFs and long-term gains post the liquidation is taxed in India at a reasonably low rate of 12.5% instead of at 30% rate in US.  If you park funds in RFC account, it can count towards fixed income portion of your portfolio & the interest is tax free till RNOR after which it becomes taxable as per slab rates.

You may prefer this option if your portfolio is low, you cannot keep funds locked till age 59.5 or don’t want the stress of India tax litigation risk at a later stage.

A caution – Purely considered from the point of view of corpus growth (ignoring US/India taxes), Option 2 may be better as you don’t interrupt the tax free compounding of the funds.

Option 2 – Keep the 401k active till age 59.5.

In this option, if you live till 59.5, there will be an income tax in US at 30% on distribution.

No state tax if you’re not a state resident.

However, if you die prior to withdrawal, there’ll be an estate tax (between 18-40% above USD 60000). This option makes more sense for someone who does not need the funds till age 59.5 or someone who has a say > 75% chance of moving to US prior to withdrawal as in that case the withdrawal will be taxed at graduated rates and there’ll be a possibility to split it in multiple years to lower the US tax liability significantly. However, if the person has made Section 158 election in India, the tax deferred accretion in account post ROR will be taxed in the year one moves to US & becomes NRI.

Option 3 – Opt for Substantial Equal Periodic Payments (SEPP)

SEPP stands for Substantially Equal Periodic Payments. If you elect this option, then the withdrawal from the 401K is penalty-free. Under the India US DTAA, you can try to elect for benefit of Article 20 wherein these periodic payments can be treated as a pension and only India will have the right to tax these payments. You can provide the W8BEN with the U.S. provider stating the treaty benefits to ensure that the provider does not withhold any taxes on those payments.

However, there are a few points that one needs to keep in mind if a SEPP election is made as follows:

1. Distribution in India will most likely be taxed as per the normal slab rates. There is no reduced rate of withholding prescribed under the DTAA for these payments. So if you are under the 30% tax bracket at the time of your return to India, then these payments will be taxed at 30%.
2. Certain election terms in the SEPP are irreversible for longer of 5 years/age 59.5 and if terms are changed prior, the tax not levied earlier may be recaptured.
3. The election under the SEPP does not avoid the existing funds in the 401k from being subject to estate tax and hence they continue to be subject to estate tax.
4. No taxes in US. However, I feel that while under the treaty income is not taxable in US, a 1040-NR along with a treaty position disclosure statement in Form 8833 may be needed. 

Though this is untested and no clear judicial precedents are available and can cause tax litigation risk with US/India tax office. You should check with US custodian whether they will not withhold any tax due to W8BEN with treaty claim.

May not be the best option if you’re going to be in the higher tax slabs in India. The money that remains in 401k is still exposed to estate tax. It also has certain restrictions and limitations. It may work in a narrow scenario of low tax brackets in India & estate tax risk covered in US.

Should I rollover my 401k to a Traditional IRA?

Yes this is advisable, if there are no restrictions (e.g. continuing with same employer on return to India). 401k is an employer linked account, whereas T-IRA is your own account. I would any day prefer, after leaving employment, to have the account that I own.

I’ve came across articles where it’s said that a Meta 401k offers some excellent investment options so not advisable to rollover to an IRA – that may be true for people who continue being US residents, however in my view, for a returning NRI, the concerns with respect to ease of access of funds after return and a possibly punitive taxation as 401k vs IRA (unrecognised PF) under India tax law outweighs the benefits of maintain 401k for whatever excellent investment options it provides.

One more angle is the state tax – if a state under its tax provisions can source IRA distributions to itself & tax it even after a person becomes a non-resident of the state for tax purposes, in that case, if the plan is to liquidate 401k after becoming NRA, a safe option can be to let the funds remain in the 401k and then take out a distribution as a non-resident of the state wherein the distribution cannot be sourced to the state in view of Title 4/Section 114 prohibition as discussed earlier. But do check with the 401k provider whether it will continue to service you after you move out of the US.

Should I rollover 401k to a Roth IRA before moving to India?

Similar to what the English teacher says in the Indian movie “Phas Gaye Obama”, I will also say this – No. Never. Not😊

I see this suggestion being floated on some forums and unfortunately even by some tax professionals who are not well versed with the India + US tax implications of this action – they apply the logic that this conversion avoids the 10% additional tax which is otherwise applicable to an early 401k withdrawal and Roth is tax free.

Note that while converting from 401k to Roth you have to pay tax on ordinary income rates in US. Fine till here. The problem arises that after return to India and entering ROR status, India likely doesn’t protect Roth from an annual taxation regime (can’t make Section 158 election) & you would be liable to taxes in India on any accretions in Roth. This could have been avoided if you have sticked to pre-tax 401k or a rollover IRA. So, you end up paying taxes in the US first and then you again pay taxes on the earnings in India.

The question to ask is – What is the use to get into a tax-free Roth withdrawal in US after age 59.5 when the entire fund and earnings get taxed? For those thinking of this strategy, think about possible US + India combined tax implications before deciding.

What to do with 401k if you are a USC/GC returning to India

If you are a USC (or you are a NRA & your spouse as USC) – the big risk which is estate tax gets mostly nullified. Then it’s a question of mainly income tax.

As a USC, you may have a higher probability of returning to US in your retirement wherein you may want to keep the pre-tax 401k active (or rollover to T-IRA), make Section 158 election and liquidate smartly by splitting in your sunset years where you have low income.

As a GC, know that you may still be considered non-domiciliary of US so estate tax risk may still apply and you need to have appropriate insurance coverage etc. to protect yourself.

As a USC/GC you need to take care to update W9 instead of W8BEN after return to India.

Even if you’re a USC/GC, you get the RNOR status in India (if eligible by days calculation), can make Section 158 election and need to disclose foreign assets in Schedule FA after ROR.

Note that though US citizens & residents generally cant access benefits under the DTAA due to savings clause, Article 20(2) is one of the exceptions to it, which may allow even a USC who is in ROR status in India to access the benefits under that Article. 

If you’re a USC or GC (qualify as Long Term Resident for purpose of Section 877A of IRC), you need to be mindful of possible exit tax implications if eligible, which shall include a mark to market tax in US on the fund value in your 401k also.

401k Return to India Checklist for Non-USC/GC

If you plan to continue 401k till age 59.5

1. You may want to rollover your 401k to a Traditional IRA (destination also known as Rollover IRA – something like this) before moving out of the US. Ensure the broker will support you as a US-non-resident (I think brokers like Fidelity, Schwab, IBKR do)
2. Ensure your beneficiary nomination is clearly done in the IRA. If you have a revocable trust, the trust can be the beneficiary in your 401k.
3. Cover estate tax risk in US. One easy way is via pure term insurance. I’ve discussed on that here
4. On return to India & becoming NRA of US, update address and file W8BEN with the custodian.
5. File Form 40 on the Income Tax portal in the first year of ROR by the original due date of the tax return. As clarified in the 2025 ITAT judgement in case of Jignesh Jariwala, there’s no need to file this form every year.
6. Make proper disclosure of 401k in Indian tax return after ROR – you’ll need to file ITR2/3 as it contains Schedule FA. This is very important as non-disclosure carries a flat penalty of INR 10 lacs.

If you plan to liquidate 401k

1. Timing of liquidating 401k (prior to or after return to India) will depend on your RNOR eligibility in India, and the federal and state tax rates in India.
2. If you’re living in a high tax state, it is a no-brainer to liquidate after returning to India and close ties with the state so that the distribution cannot be sourced to the state at a later point in time.
3. If you liquidate within RNOR, generally if you take a conservative view that entire distribution is FDAP then timing within RNOR does not matter as US tax is flat 30% across, so a better approach can be to liquidate as early as possible & move funds outside of US or in checking account to reduce estate tax exposure. Remember, cash/money market holdings in a custodian.brokerage account may still be exposed to US estate tax.
4. Care may be taken to avoid transfer of 401k directly to an Indian bank account within ROR – transfer from Custodian > US bank account > Indian bank account

401k Return to India Checklist for USC/GC

If you plan to continue 401k till age 59.5

1. You may want to rollover your 401k to a Traditional IRA (destination also known as Rollover IRA – something like this) before moving out of the US.
2. Ensure your beneficiary nomination is clearly done in the IRA. If you have a revocable trust, the trust can be the beneficiary in your 401k.
3. Update address & W9 with custodian with India address on return to India
4. File Form 40 on the Income Tax portal in the first year of ROR by the original due date of the tax return. As clarified in the 2025 ITAT judgement in case of Jignesh Jariwala, there’s no need to file this form every year.
5. Make proper disclosure of 401k in Indian tax return after ROR – you’ll need to file ITR2/3 as it contains Schedule FA. This is very important as non-disclosure carries a flat penalty of INR 10 lacs. There is also a disclosure needed in Schedule SI (Salary Income) 

If you plan to liquidate 401k

1. Update address & W9 with custodian with India address on return to India
2. Check eligibility for RNOR. If eligible, split the distributions between RNOR years (generally up to 3 US tax year splits possible in case of 2 RNOR years) to stay in lower tax brackets.
3. If you’re living in a high tax state, it is a no-brainer to close ties with the state so that the distribution cannot be sourced to the state at a later point in time.
4. Care may be taken to avoid transfer of 401k directly to an Indian bank account within ROR – transfer from Custodian > US bank account > Indian bank account

Tax Strategy Possibilities

Following are some of the tax strategies that one may evaluate implementing in her case, ideally under the guidance of a tax professional having understanding of both US & India tax & estate law aspects.

1. Whether to liquidate or to continue
2. Buying term insurance coverage of covering estate tax impact through other means
3. Timing of liquidation – pre or post return to India
4. Whether to make an election under Section 158 in ROR status
5. Making use of Net Unrealised Appreciation (NUA) Tax strategy if beneficial
6. Opting for SEPP & availing benefit under India-US DTAA
7. Following a proper asset location strategy for distributing investments between in tax advantaged accounts like 401k and taxable accounts
8. Taking lump sum distribution at age 59.5 vs allowing funds to grow and taking RMDs after age 73

Other points

1. If you have a 401k and return to India and continue working with the same employer, the terms of the 401k may be such that you cannot liquidate or rollover the 401k to a Rollover IRA till you leave the employer. In that situation, best you can do is to wait till you leave employment and cover estate tax risk with insurance etc.
2. If you are not a USC/GC & return to India & become an Indian resident, though your SSN must be available on file, make sure also to file W8BEN with the US broker & also update your Indian address in that account. This will avoid any possible instance of 24% backup withholding that may apply if no SSN/W8BEN is available on file and allow you to get a 1042-S (for NRA) instead of 1099 (for US residents). Note that filing W8BEN will not help in reducing the tax withholding as India-US DTAA does not prescribe any lower rate for 401k (except in case of SEPP type payments) and hence the broker will withhold flat 30% on the entire distribution.
3. If you’ve taken a distribution, you’ll need to file 1040/1040-NR to pay the 10% additional tax – generally you should pay off this tax by way of estimated tax to reduce chance of underpayment penalty if paying at the time of filing tax returns.
4. If you made non-deductible contributions to a Traditional IRA (i.e., after-tax basis), and you are taking distributions, you must file Form 8606 to calculate the taxablevs non-taxableportion of the distribution. You may also need to file Form 5329 to report the 10% additional tax if applicable.
5. As per a recent judgement by ITAT in case of Jignesh Naresh Jariwala v. Deputy Director of Income-tax, CPC, Bengaluru – [2025] 178 taxmann.com 233, it was held that Form 40 once filed stays relevant for future years also and need not be filed every year.
6. Taxpayer should maintain custodian statements year wise with a contempreneous tax log with clear segregation between own contributions/employer contributions/ earnings as custodians don’t usually provide that level of detail in 1042-S – so that at a later date if Indian tax office takes a different view, you have all the information in place rather than reaching the custodians for prior period statements etc at that time. 
7. Some US states like CA may be aggressive in holding that the retirement plan is not qualfied and hence deny the state tax exemption for retirement income for non-residents – in such cases, it may be better to obtain and keep for record the plan summary description for the 401k as a proof that it was a qualfied plan.

Conclusion

A 401k is a significant part of a Indian expat working in US and needs significant thought and planning to ensure that a large part of the gains is not lost in tax inefficiency or estate planning gaps. This is even more important considering the lack of clarity on the India side, which makes an informed and calculated decisioning very important. Given the number of returning NRIs to India with 401ks and recent changes like tax deferral election introduced in 2021, both taxpayers and advisers should watch this space closely for further developments and fine tune/align their wealth/advisory strategy basis the same.

About the Author

Abhinav Gulechha is a Chartered Accountant (CA) from India with 22+ years of experience in corporate risk management, compliance, and cross-border tax & estate strategy involving both India & the US along with expertise in other relevant laws such as Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and Black Money Act. He works exclusively in the area of India-US Tax & Estate Strategy issues of NRIs & Global Indian families. He is a fully independent consultant with no financial/referral-based tie-ups with any professional firms or service providers, which ensures that his advice is free from confict of interest and in the best interest of his clients. He is also a member of Bombay Chartered Accountants Society, Mumbai. Abhinav can be reached at contact@abhinavgulechha.com. 

Disclaimer

2026 CA Abhinav Gulechha. All Rights Reserved. All text, analysis, and proprietary frameworks are the exclusive property of CA Abhinav Gulechha. Unauthorized reproduction, digital scraping, or full reposting is strictly prohibited. You may share brief excerpts (under 200 words) provided you include clear attribution and a direct backlink to this original URL. This analysis is intended for general guidance and is not a substitute for formal tax or legal advice. Cross-border regulations are highly fact-specific; do not act on this information without a professional consultation tailored to your jurisdiction. CA Abhinav Gulechhaprovides this content “as is” & assumes no any direct, indirect, consequential liability for errors, omissions, or the results of actions taken based on this information.